Qorx

Independent review brief

Qorx needs independent technical review. This page is for editors, reviewers, and developers who want to evaluate the project without using maintainer copy.

What to test

Qorx Community Edition is an AGPL-licensed Rust source project for local context resolution. It defines:

The core claim is narrow: Qorx lets a workflow carry a small program or handle and resolve context locally, instead of repeatedly pasting large prompt payloads.

Install

Build from source:

git clone https://github.com/bbrainfuckk/qorx.git
cd qorx
cargo test
cargo build --release

Quick check

./target/release/qorx --version
./target/release/qorx doctor --json
./target/release/qorx strict-answer "what proves this repository contains the Qorx runtime?"

Minimal source file:

QORX 1
use std.evidence
use std.branch as br
let question = "which files explain how Qorx keeps local evidence outside the model prompt?"
let fallback = "qv0d: local evidence does not support this answer"
pack evidence from question budget 700
cache evidence key question ttl 3600
strict answer from evidence limit 2
if supported(answer) then emit answer else emit fallback

Compile and run:

./target/release/qorx qorx-compile goal.qorx --out goal.qorxb
./target/release/qorx qorx goal.qorxb

Review questions

Scope

Qorx is not a hosted AI service, a general-purpose language, a Forth implementation, or a general compression system. It cannot reconstruct arbitrary unknown files from a tiny message. It cannot make a remote model know hidden local data without a resolver path.

Qorx Ayie is the supported local product. Qorx Ayie Starter gives new accounts 5,000 included Ayie/Cloud requests across Windows, macOS, and Linux before subscription. Edge adds signed installers, tray UX, daemon management, provider routing, account activation, and managed local-vault behavior.

Token counts in Qorx docs are deterministic local estimates unless another tokenizer is explicitly named.

Maintainer disclosure

Qorx is maintained by Marvin Sarreal Villanueva. Reviews, articles, and posts written by the maintainer are not independent coverage. Independent reviewers should write their own conclusions, including negative ones.